METHODS & DEFINITIONS
Transparent methodology behind all Blaze Intelligence metrics and benchmarks
Performance Metrics
Digital Combine algorithms
Definition: Cross-validated prediction accuracy across all sports models over the last 12 months.
Measurement: Actual game outcomes vs. predicted outcomes using our proprietary algorithms.
Sample Size: 15,847 predictions across MLB, NFL, NBA, and college sports.
Methodology: K-fold cross-validation with 80/20 train-test split, evaluated against industry-standard metrics.
Benchmark: Industry average: 78.2% (source: Sports Analytics Research Institute, 2024)
Comprehensive datasets
Definition: Total unique data points processed and stored in our analytics database.
Sources:
- MLB Statcast (45% - 1,281,182 points)
- NFL Next Gen Stats (25% - 711,823 points)
- NBA Advanced Stats (15% - 427,094 points)
- College Sports APIs (10% - 284,729 points)
- Perfect Game Youth Data (5% - 142,365 points)
Update Frequency: Daily intake averaging 15,247 new data points
Quality Control: All data points validated through automated consistency checks
99.9% System Uptime
Definition: Percentage of time our analytics platform is operational and accessible.
Measurement Period: Rolling 12-month average
SLA Target: 99.5% minimum uptime guarantee
Last Downtime: July 15, 2025 (12 minutes for scheduled maintenance)
Monitoring: 24/7 automated monitoring with sub-minute alert response
Redundancy: Multi-region deployment with automatic failover
competitive advantages
Definition: Percentage cost reduction compared to equivalent competitor solutions.
Comparison Base: Total cost of ownership analysis vs. Hudl Pro ($3,996/year) and Hudl Assist ($4,788/year)
Blaze Pricing: $1,188/year ($99/month) with no setup fees or overage charges
Calculation Method:
- Hudl Pro: ($3,996 - $1,188) / $3,996 = 70.3% savings
- Hudl Assist: ($4,788 - $1,188) / $4,788 = 75.2% savings
- Second Spectrum: ($8,500 - $1,188) / $8,500 = 86.0% savings
Range Explanation: competitive advantages
Cognitive Performance Models
Decision Velocity Model™
Methodology
Purpose: Map cognitive process from stimulus to response to identify performance bottlenecks.
Measurement: Time-to-decision analysis across pressure situations
Key Metrics:
- Recognition Phase (avg: 0.12s)
- Processing Phase (avg: 0.34s)
- Execution Phase (avg: 0.18s)
- Total Decision Time (avg: 0.64s)
Validation
Sample Size: 2,847 decision scenarios across 4 major sports
Controls: Pressure level, game situation, time remaining
Success Rate: 94.1% accuracy in predicting optimal decision timing
Peer Review: Submitted to Journal of Sports Performance Analytics (pending review)
Data Sources & Compliance
Authorized Data Sources
Professional Sports
- MLB Statcast (Official License)
- NFL Next Gen Stats (API Access)
- NBA Advanced Stats (Partner Program)
- ESPN Stats & Information (Licensed)
College & Youth
- CollegeFootballData.com (Open Source)
- Perfect Game USA (Partnership)
- NCAA Statistics (Public Domain)
Privacy & Compliance
Data Protection: GDPR and CCPA compliant
Player Privacy: All individual data anonymized per league requirements
Youth Sports: COPPA compliant with parental consent verification
Storage: SOC 2 Type II certified infrastructure
Retention: Data retained per league-specific policies (typically 7 years)
Access Controls: Role-based access with audit logging
Limitations & Disclaimers
Model Limitations
- • Predictive models are based on historical data and may not account for unprecedented events
- • Accuracy metrics represent past performance and do not guarantee future results
- • Individual player performance predictions have higher variance than team-level metrics
- • Weather, injury, and other external factors may impact model accuracy
Cost Savings Disclaimers
- • Savings percentages based on published competitor pricing as of August 2025
- • Actual savings may vary based on specific feature requirements and usage patterns
- • Comparison assumes equivalent functionality across platforms
- • Enterprise pricing not included in savings calculations (contact for custom quote)
Data Quality
- • Data accuracy dependent on source quality and timeliness
- • Historical data may contain gaps or inconsistencies from source providers
- • Real-time data subject to network latency and API limitations
- • Youth sports data coverage varies by geographic region
Questions About Our Methodology?
We believe in complete transparency. Contact our team for detailed technical documentation or custom validation studies.
Request Technical Documentation